Step 1
Set release criteria
Write down the user, decision and unacceptable failure before choosing a metric. This prevents a polished demo from becoming the evaluation standard.
Treat missing evidence as an explicit state. A result should explain what supports it, how confident the team can be and what to collect next.
Step 2
Separate score from confidence
Use representative evidence and keep the tested provider, model, operation, account, region and time window attached to every conclusion.
Treat missing evidence as an explicit state. A result should explain what supports it, how confident the team can be and what to collect next.
Step 3
Review safety and operations
Use representative evidence and keep the tested provider, model, operation, account, region and time window attached to every conclusion.
Treat missing evidence as an explicit state. A result should explain what supports it, how confident the team can be and what to collect next.
Step 4
Record an accountable decision
Use representative evidence and keep the tested provider, model, operation, account, region and time window attached to every conclusion.
Treat missing evidence as an explicit state. A result should explain what supports it, how confident the team can be and what to collect next.
- Decision owner named
- Evidence scope recorded
- Limitations visible
- Next review scheduled
Next step
Turn the framework into one representative evaluation.
Use a starter template or request a reviewed benchmark. Do not send credentials or confidential production data through a public form.